• Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Except, you know, the stock being tied to ownership in a company that sells real goods or services.

    That’s the scam: without dividends, or at least the reasonable prospect of dividends, it is not tied to the company in any tangible way. Until the shareholders benefit from the business operations, rather than mere speculation, these stocks are not any different than crypto.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Almost. If you own a share of a company, you own a share of something fungible, namely literal company property or IP. Even if the company went bankrupt, you own a sliver of their real product (real estate, computers, patented processes). So while you may be speculating on the wealth associated with the company, it is not a scam in the sense that it isn’t a non fungible entity. The sole value of crypto currency is in its speculative value, it is not tied in theory or in practice to something of perceptibly equal realized value. A dividend is just giving you return on profit made from realized assets (aforementioned real estate or other company property or processes), but the stock itself is intrinsically tied to the literal ownership of those profit generating assets.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Everything you just said is only true for stocks that pay dividends now, or may pay dividends in the future.

        It is not true for companies with zero intention of ever paying dividends.

        Even if the company went bankrupt, you own a sliver of their real product

        Historically, when that happens, the creditors walk away with the assets. The shareholders get nothing.

        but the stock itself is intrinsically tied to the literal ownership of those profit generating assets.

        That’s the scam. It’s not. In practice, the sole value of a zero-dividend stock is the speculative value.

        it is not tied in theory or in practice to something of perceptibly equal realized value.

        Electricity has value. Crypto value is intrinsically tied to mining costs. That would make zero-dividend stocks a bigger scam than crypto.