• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Starving children in Gaza, who will never see their families again because they’re dead

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      So unless someone is bombed and starving they deserve no sympathy? What kinda brain dead take is that?

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You said verbatim, that a quadriplegic guy hoping to regain some control deserves no sympathy and then immediately went to war orphans in Gaza. I’m not putting anything in your mouth you didn’t shit out of it before

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s not what I said. That’s just what you wanted to hear so your tantrum could be justified.

            Perhaps if you spent Less time making up lies and more time learning how to read, you wouldn’t be in this predicament.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Of course it’s not where I draw the line. Don’t be obtuse.

        When asked who deserves sympathy, I gave an answer— and a far more deserving one than this dope.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Even the worst people in history were at some point just a child that we could have potentially saved. Even as an adult, or after doing evil, I think sympathy and compassion never stops being the right answer. It’s just in practice we have to prioritise: the needy, the many.