Seems like you use the phrase “highly regulated” differently then me. You use it to describe the “how”, for me the “what” is sufficient.
From my point of view the law heavily restricts people’s freedom to be, that’s the mistake. Doesn’t matter the specific implementation, acronym, task force, …
An example for highly regulated for me would be a periodic audit to insure security and compliance with security control.
This law is honestly dangerous in regards to privacy and endangers miners not help them. There no safety guards whatsoever.
Seems like you use the phrase “highly regulated” differently then me. You use it to describe the “how”, for me the “what” is sufficient.
From my point of view the law heavily restricts people’s freedom to be, that’s the mistake. Doesn’t matter the specific implementation, acronym, task force, …
An example for highly regulated for me would be a periodic audit to insure security and compliance with security control. This law is honestly dangerous in regards to privacy and endangers miners not help them. There no safety guards whatsoever.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5208739
You are correct that this law is dangerous regardless lf implementation though.