Destide@feddit.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 23 days agoInfallible Codelemmy.mlimagemessage-square155linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageInfallible Codelemmy.mlDestide@feddit.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square155linkfedilink
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 days agoI don’t want unseeded randomness in my tests, ever. Seed the tests, and making these pass would be trivial.
minus-squareFrederikNJS@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 days agoThe right tool for the right job ¯\(ツ)/¯
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 days agoThe right tool here is tests at a level higher than machine code instructions that have been in CPUs since the 70s. Maybe TDD practice is not to test at this level, but every example of TDD sure tends to be something similar!
I don’t want unseeded randomness in my tests, ever.
Seed the tests, and making these pass would be trivial.
The right tool for the right job ¯\(ツ)/¯
The right tool here is tests at a level higher than machine code instructions that have been in CPUs since the 70s. Maybe TDD practice is not to test at this level, but every example of TDD sure tends to be something similar!