• TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They use their own repos, but they don’t hold back the packages. The reason for having separate repos is recompiling packages for newer architectures. It gives a little performance boost for most of them. AUR works totally fine.

    • Nico198X@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      no. it is akin to Manjaro in that it is based on Arch repos, but is opinionated. they have their own kernel, wine, proton, with their patches.

      • kurcatovium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m asking whether it’s more like “arch with some custom spice” or rather something vaguely similar to arch like “ubuntu is like debian”. I tried manjaro long, long time ago and can’t remember much more than using AUR being mess due to not really being arch

        • Nico198X@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s not really arch. It’s more like Ubuntu is to Debian.

          EndeavourOS is straight arch repos, with one additional optional repo of their own with a few of their tools, branding, etc.

          Cachy is opinionated about the OS.

          EndeavourOS is only opinionated about the install setup. Arch with sane defaults.

          • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            While I see the analogy, saying “CachyOS to Arch is like Ubuntu to Debian” with a straight face is not something I can do. If you try to interact with an Ubuntu install like it’s Debian, you’ll get very frustrated very quickly. If you try to interact with a CachyOS install like it’s Arch, you probably won’t even notice you are not on Arch, besides a couple of different package names.

            • Nico198X@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              i suppose, it’s a loose analogy he brought up, so i was just trying to speak his language.

              the point is, the packages are different, particularly core ones. so it is not straight Arch.