We all see and hear what goes on over there. Kim will execute kids if they don’t cheer hard enough at his birthday party or something? He’s always threatening to nuke countries and is probably has the highest domestic kill count out of any world leader today.

So I ask? Why don’t any other countries step in to help those people. I saw a survey asking Americans and Escaped North Koreans would they migrate to North Korea and to the US if given the chance (hypothetical for the refugees). And it was like <0.1% to 95%. Obviously those people live in terror.

Why do we just allow this to happen in modern civilization? Nukes on South Korea? Is just not lucrative to step in? SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE!?

  • anachrohack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s not inconsequential, but to blame the entire state if the country on the bombing campaign of the 1950s is to

    1. Ignore the period that took place between the 1950s and the 1990s, during which their country was rebuilt with support from the soviet union (just as south korea was rebuilt with support from the US)

    2. Deprive their government of literally all agency and blame their problems on the United States because it confirms your political biases