• KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    No, distros instead use a web of trust in the maintainers. New maintainers are vetted and established ones are assumed to not suddenly turn into malicious actors.
    There’s an ongoing project that tries to bootstrap a Debian system from a seed that’s small enough to be read, but it’s more of a proof of concept at this stage, and even this project requires trust into a few parts up front (like xz of all things).

    • biribiri11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wouldn’t place too much faith in the vetting process. As of right now, there are 2,034 members of the packager group of Fedora. None of them are required to have 2FA (or any real account security past a password), and the minimum requirements to join the group aren’t very high (contribute a package, pick up an unmaintained one, etc). Any of those 2,034 people can push malware to Fedora, and within a week, it’d be in stable repos.

      Most of these distros are volunteer efforts. They don’t have the manpower to ensure the software supply chain remains secure.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Any of those 2,034 people can push malware to Fedora

        Maybe, but that is still a significantly higher bar than allowing everyone to publish a package the way most language specific package repositories work (or just use any random github repo even like some others).