Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 1 year agoProton Mail Discloses User Data Leading to Arrest in Spainrestoreprivacy.comexternal-linkmessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkProton Mail Discloses User Data Leading to Arrest in Spainrestoreprivacy.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square91fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoDid you read the story? Or are you just here to stir the pot and display your Proton Fanboi bona fides?
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI question if you’ve read the story. Its a very clear case that is painted in the story.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago Its a very clear case that is painted in the story. Indeed it is. The police asked and Proton provided. Very clear indeed. At last, something we can agree on.
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoLike… They are required to do by law because its a terrorism case.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoQuestionable and not the point.
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThe pointis that the person is an idiot and Proton had to comply with a request about a terrorist.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThe point is that Proton, a company that sells privacy, violated that trust, apparently without much of a fight. The Spanish police didn’t even allege that the person is a terrorist. I think we’re done here. We’re not even speaking the same language. Have a nice life.
minus-squareDiamond_AaronXG@mstdn.partylinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago@CaptObvious @Mikufan if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue. Proton provides privacy not anonymity. Those are 2 different things. The second requires opsec in the users end.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue Agreed Proton provides privacy not anonymity Anonymity most certainly is a part of privacy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/it-privacy/ https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity/ https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/09/05/anonymity-privacy-and-security-online/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy
Did you read the story? Or are you just here to stir the pot and display your Proton Fanboi bona fides?
I question if you’ve read the story. Its a very clear case that is painted in the story.
Indeed it is. The police asked and Proton provided. Very clear indeed.
At last, something we can agree on.
Like… They are required to do by law because its a terrorism case.
Questionable and not the point.
The pointis that the person is an idiot and Proton had to comply with a request about a terrorist.
The point is that Proton, a company that sells privacy, violated that trust, apparently without much of a fight.
The Spanish police didn’t even allege that the person is a terrorist.
I think we’re done here. We’re not even speaking the same language.
Have a nice life.
@CaptObvious @Mikufan if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue. Proton provides privacy not anonymity. Those are 2 different things. The second requires opsec in the users end.
Agreed
Anonymity most certainly is a part of privacy.