• Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Rockets: Unmanned

    Twitter: Manned

    The difference in importance seems correct to me

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they’re “manned”. However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called “current legislation” and “capitalism”, no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! …Isn’t this great?

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Then it’s a good thing you’re not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?

          The fact remains that a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit that is entirely absent from words. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.

          Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists?

          Again, total lack of perspective.