Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoFirefox is fine. The people running it are notwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square193fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkFirefox is fine. The people running it are notwww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square193fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoRefusal to make a “political” statement is very much political when the politics in question is about acknowledging non-men exist. There is no politically neutral choice when there are two options who are both political.
minus-squarePushButton@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoThat’s totally false. One can write using the generic masculine form without making a political statement. This is not even close to not acknowledge there is non-men in this world. What you are putting forward is absurd. No one is saying that only men exist anywhere in here.
Refusal to make a “political” statement is very much political when the politics in question is about acknowledging non-men exist. There is no politically neutral choice when there are two options who are both political.
That’s totally false.
One can write using the generic masculine form without making a political statement.
This is not even close to not acknowledge there is non-men in this world.
What you are putting forward is absurd. No one is saying that only men exist anywhere in here.