if you made a shitty hand drawing, even in the old mspaint, the thing would be funnier.
do you think wojack and rage comics were popular for their artistic craftsmanship? or because they seemed relatable as they were apparently made with little skill or effort?
Those comics were much more difficult to draw than you imagine. Try it – it isn’t easy. Those memes had their own aesthetics. They weren’t just poorely drawn.
if you made a shitty hand drawing, even in the old mspaint, the thing would be funnier.
Bad picture is a bad picture. It might be intentionally bad because of some context, but you can’t make something funnier just by decreasing the quality of illustration.
I don’t see how you can make OP’s message funnier by worse illustation.
there’s such a thing called “copyright”, and using countless pieces of art for free so that a couple of douchebags become gazillionnaires selling copyright infringement on said pieces of art certainly feels like theft
You have to be a bot to be this stupid… The copyright holders that are being ripped off are INDIVIDUAL ARTISTS, not the fucks making money off the back of their work. Your understanding of this conversation let alone the topic is beyond pathetic.
It isn’t “slop”. This image is magnitude more quality than most people are able to draw.
True, but I’m here for human conversations, not just me talking to chatgpt.
Human interactions can be both good and bad, but its still human interactions.
Are we still talking about the illustration?
Interaction doesn’t imply text.
you should feel ashamed for this comment
if you made a shitty hand drawing, even in the old mspaint, the thing would be funnier.
do you think wojack and rage comics were popular for their artistic craftsmanship? or because they seemed relatable as they were apparently made with little skill or effort?
Those comics were much more difficult to draw than you imagine. Try it – it isn’t easy. Those memes had their own aesthetics. They weren’t just poorely drawn.
Bad picture is a bad picture. It might be intentionally bad because of some context, but you can’t make something funnier just by decreasing the quality of illustration.
I don’t see how you can make OP’s message funnier by worse illustation.
it is funnier if it doesn’t look like generic slop.
I wrote on a magnitude English better quality than 90% of the world.
And?
it’s been trained on art stolen from people who can draw orders of magnitude better than this
Learning isn’t stealing. Humans also learn by looking at different works. By “stealing,” as you call it.
there’s such a thing called “copyright”, and using countless pieces of art for free so that a couple of douchebags become gazillionnaires selling copyright infringement on said pieces of art certainly feels like theft
Poor gazillionaires (sobbing). Can we donate them? I can send them a few kg of shit. Or some grass, now it is a season for the grass.
You’re the one defending the gazillionaires. They’re saying the gazillionaires are the ones profiting from stealing, and they’re right.
No, gazilionaries – copyright owners. And you are defending them.
You have to be a bot to be this stupid… The copyright holders that are being ripped off are INDIVIDUAL ARTISTS, not the fucks making money off the back of their work. Your understanding of this conversation let alone the topic is beyond pathetic.
I agree that it’s not stealing. It’s automated plagiarism.