the latest BRICS summit recently completed

  • nebulaone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think we have come to some kind of a conclusion that neither of us is willing to part from. Maybe I am the idiot and wrong, but I’m good on this for now. Maybe I’ll have some more energy another day.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fair enough. I recommend reading the ProleWiki page on imperialism I linked, it’s much shorter than reading Lenin and can help get you to look at the problems (presumably) we both experience in decaying western countries, and how we can chart a course for a better world. You can’t find solutions without proper analysis of the underlying problems.

      • nebulaone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seems like a very unbiased encyclopedia. If a methodology of analysis is skewed towards presenting what the author intended it is pretty much useless. I haven’t read it yet, this is just a gut feeling, maybe I’ll check it out tomorrow.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s openly biased towards communism, it’s a Marxist-Leninist encyclopedia. Wikipedia is also biased towards a western, liberal viewpoint. Truth is underlying and independent of interpretation, but how truth is presented is where bias shines through, and shine it does no matter where you find your source, as every source is biased. ProleWiki is nice because it includes its sources, even though it’s a work in progress, and more importantly the article on imperialism is an explanation of the concept and how it exists in reality from the Marxist-Leninist point of view.

          If someone has a different definition of imperialism, you can still read the ProleWiki article and appreciate it, just substitute “imperialism” with “Leninist imperialism,” and read the article with that in mind. Saying a country does or doesn’t meet the Leninist definition of imperialism doesn’t mean it necessarily fits or doesn’t fit other definitions of imperialism. The Leninist interpretation is widespread, however, because it’s useful, and as such serves as an excellent explanation for how capitalism in developed countries functions and why it’s simultaneously wealthy and declining rapidly.