Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square256fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square256fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoNo the chances of being wrong 10x in a row are 2%. So the chances of being at least right once are 98%.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoAh, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049 so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent. No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·17 hours agoThat looks better. Even with a fair coin, 10 heads in a row is almost impossible. And if you are feeding the output back into a new instance of a model then the quality is highly likely to degrade.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 hours agoWhereas if you ask a human to do the same thing ten times, the probability that they get all ten right is astronomically higher than 0.0000059049.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 hours agoDunno. Asking 10 humans at random to do a task and probably one will do it better than AI. Just not as fast.
No the chances of being wrong 10x in a row are 2%. So the chances of being at least right once are 98%.
Ah, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049
so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent.
No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.
That looks better. Even with a fair coin, 10 heads in a row is almost impossible.
And if you are feeding the output back into a new instance of a model then the quality is highly likely to degrade.
Whereas if you ask a human to do the same thing ten times, the probability that they get all ten right is astronomically higher than 0.0000059049.
Dunno. Asking 10 humans at random to do a task and probably one will do it better than AI. Just not as fast.