Quest to create viable human sex cells in lab progressing rapidly, with huge implications for reproduction

Scientists are just a few years from creating viable human sex cells in the lab, according to an internationally renowned pioneer of the field, who says the advance could open up biology-defying possibilities for reproduction.

Speaking to the Guardian, Prof Katsuhiko Hayashi, a developmental geneticist at the University of Osaka, said rapid progress is being made towards being able to transform adult skin or blood cells into eggs and sperm, a feat of genetic conjury known as in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG).

His own lab is about seven years away from the milestone, he predicts. Other frontrunners include a team at the University of Kyoto and a California-based startup, Conception Biosciences, whose Silicon Valley backers include the OpenAI founder, Sam Altman and whose CEO told the Guardian that growing eggs in the lab “might be the best tool we have to reverse population decline” and could pave the way for human gene editing.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not necessarily at that exact number, replacement is 2.1 which is what I’m actually proposing

      • Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It seems like you are for a stable population (let me know if that is wrong) and I am for a stable population at a lower level. I don’t think that these two positions are that far apart. I understand that you want to avoid the struggle of dealing with a lopsided generational distribution while I see population reduction, not just the elimination of growth, as necessary to improve the overall quality of life for all people*.

        *While I was typing this, I thought to myself, “Oh yeah, okay. This is how Thanos got going.”

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depopulation to a lower level will bring unnecessary hardship to the older generations and slow down technological progress.

          • Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I think that where we are parting is ways is on the value of progress. If progress were an equitable share of all resources and an improvement in everyone’s quality of life, then I would be on board. However, in our current system, progress means infinitely growing wealth for some and infinitely growing labor for others. I believe that we should be less focused on progress and more focused on health and happiness, and these things do not require a lot of people.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 hours ago

              My grandfather went to the bathroom in the outhouse (I know because I visited him). The improvement in the modern lifestyle is huge. You just don’t know because you grew up with running water and didn’t grow your own chickens for eggs