cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32388210

The Trump administration’s proposed budget seeks to shut down the laboratory atop a peak in Hawaii where scientists have gathered the most conclusive evidence of human-caused climate change since the 1950s.

The president’s budget proposal would also defund many other climate labs, including instrument sites comprising the US government’s greenhouse gas monitoring network, which stretches from northern Alaska to the South Pole.

But it’s the Mauna Loa laboratory that is the most prominent target of the President Donald Trump’s climate ire, as measurements that began there in 1958 have steadily shown CO2’s upward march as human activities have emitted more and more of the planet-warming gas each year.

The curve produced by the Mauna Loa measurements is one of the most iconic charts in modern science, known as the Keeling Curve, after Charles David Keeling, who was the researcher who painstakingly collected the data. His son, Ralph Keeling, a professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, now oversees collecting and updating that data.

The proposal to shut down Mauna Loa had been made public previously but was spelled out in more detail on Monday when NOAA submitted a budget document to Congress. It made more clear that the Trump administration envisions eliminating all climate-related research work at NOAA, as had been proposed in Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for overhauling the government.

It would do this in large part by cutting NOAA’s Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research entirely, including some labs that are also involved in improving weather forecasting.

https://archive.ph/caA1y

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder how cheap it would be for a private entity to take over and fund it to continue the research that is so important

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re not shutting it down because they don’t want to pay for it. They’re shutting it down because it’s created the longest-running record of atmospheric CO2 levels, and climate facts hurt oligarchs’ feelings.

      They’re not gonna let anybody else operate it either, regardless of funding.

    • forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Really? Because privatization does not lower costs. I mean, seriously think this through - in addition to the operational costs, you are adding a layer of parasitic “capitalists” who intend to personally profit from the situation. Please explain to me how in the hell x + y is supposed to give you a lower final total than x + nothing?!?

      And when everything goes to hell because there are now parasitic sociopaths siphoning away the money, the final result is almost always to sell everything off to a “private equity” that will dismantle shit and sell it off to the highest bidder. Because that’s what private equity is - a way to transfer the value to an individual, thus depriving the public of whatever service or product involved.

      • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        What about a non-profit org? Or an international institute independent of the US government?

      • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        True; but if a nonprofit with funding from say a dozen different countries; it would be more robust against the current US government insanity

        • forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Holy hell, way to move the goal posts. 🤣

          but if a nonprofit with funding from say a dozen different countries

          That would not be a private entity…?

          Unfortunately, you’re chasing a pipe dream. Sorry, but it’s true.

          But I can’t fault you for trying to hold onto hope. What the fuck else do we have anymore?

          ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Anger.

            It motivates and lets you do what was previously unimaginable.

            Heck even private citizens could pool up enough money to fund a nonprofit to continue that work.

            • forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              It’d be worth saving, that’s for sure (the observatory).

              But, not just anger; what is required is the righteous fury from the stories that inspired the christian bible. Not the faux outrage of modern day hypocrites, but true, overwhelming fury at these injustices.

              Until then…more lives will be taken. 😔