Even just reading the abstract would make it clear why I sent you that link.
Those countries does/did not operate as communist states the way that Marx and other political theorists imaginend them.
The article details the way in which socialist theory has been implemented throughout points in history and compares and contrasts with the modern Chinese methods. It is not “just a label” as you casually threw out earlier. China has used the productive forces of capital to rapidly modernize, however they do not allow capital to be turned into political power. This is detailed in the article.
Like why are you even trying to comment on Marx’s intentions when you clearly haven’t Marx or any other theorists? This behavior is so bizarre to me.
Thanks, but what should i get out of this apparat from Soviet and Chinese history? What is it you are trying to say with this?
Even just reading the abstract would make it clear why I sent you that link.
The article details the way in which socialist theory has been implemented throughout points in history and compares and contrasts with the modern Chinese methods. It is not “just a label” as you casually threw out earlier. China has used the productive forces of capital to rapidly modernize, however they do not allow capital to be turned into political power. This is detailed in the article.
Like why are you even trying to comment on Marx’s intentions when you clearly haven’t Marx or any other theorists? This behavior is so bizarre to me.