In light of the recent TunnelVision vulnerability I wanted to share a simple firewall that I wrote for wireguard VPNs.

https://codeberg.org/xabadak/wg-lockdown

If you use a fancy official VPN client from Mullvad, PIA, etc, you won’t need this since most clients already have a kill switch built in (also called Lockdown Mode in Mullvad). This is if you use a barebones wireguard VPN like me, or if your VPN client has a poorly-designed kill switch (like NordVPN, more info here).

A firewall should mitigate the vulnerability, though it does create a side-channel that can be exploited in extremely unlikely circumstances, so a better solution would be to use network namespaces (more info here). Unfortunately I’m a noob and I couldn’t find any scripts or tools to do it that way.

  • metiulekm@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    6 months ago

    I am afraid you are still a bit misled; WireGuard is exactly what they use for the demo video. In general the underlying protocol does not matter, since the vulnerability is about telling the system to direct the packages to the attacker, completely bypassing the VPN.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      0·
      6 months ago

      That “vulnerability” seems more like a case of “people who use hostile networks have not considered which features that work as designed should be disabled in their use case”.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          0·
          6 months ago

          It does matter if people now advocate to routinely disable useful features by default because they are a problem for their particular use case.

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              0·
              6 months ago

              The ability to set static routes via DHCP server or for that matter the ability to remote boot systems via DHCP server which has similar problems if you can’t trust the DHCP server.