• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Who do you think you are in this scenario? Would you be with the guys using violence against Jews or would you be on the side that was against those guys?

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Lol you tell on yourself too much. The people using violence in that scenario was the Jews. They rose up and used violence against the Nazis that were oppressing them.

        We all know what side you’d be supporting, considering your adamant stance against those who use violence. This is exactly how liberalism enables fascism. Enjoy sitting on your fence while you still have it.

      • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        half a million civilians just lost their civil rights, nazi Germany isn’t just a metaphor or a rethorical example, it is what the republicans are doing.

        It is a literal matter of self defense and survival.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Seems a little confusing of an analogy to choose with all the antisemitism going on these days.

          Also not sure why you’d choose an uprising that failed to overthrow the Nazis, with many of the people involved dying in the attempt or dying in death camps shortly afterwards. The most of those that survived all of that immigrated to Israel or the US.

          I’m not sure what you’re saying your goal is when this is the analogy you choose.