I’ve found a few and they seem to be growing as of late:

  • questions about Lemmy demographics
  • anything discussing negative effects of porn
  • benefits of AI
  • negative effects of “wokeness”
  • critiquing of individuals in trans community
  • calling out men as predominant perpetrators of violence towards women
  • anything US pro-conservative

One topic that I’ve noticed used to be a nonstarter and is now popular is anti-democrat conversation.

What are other nonstarters you’ve experienced?

EDIT: seemingly asking people what the community doesn’t want to talk about is a nonstarter

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Yes I had an inflammatory response. I honestly don’t perceive OP as making a good faith argument when they say “negative effects of wokeness”. It’s a thought terminating cliche.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      You’re doing a lot of dodging here. The original comment you made wasn’t a neutral “observation” about AI’s impact on cognition - it was a blanket dismissal of people who criticize wokeness by claiming they’re bots. That’s textbook ad hominem: attacking the people instead of engaging with what they’re saying.

      Since then, you’ve shifted the conversation multiple times - from AI and cognition, to whether “worldview” is the right word, to tone and intent - none of which address my original criticism: that dismissing someone as a bot simply for expressing a particular opinion is intellectually lazy and corrosive to actual discussion.

      You can claim it’s just “an observation” all you want, but the reality is that you made a personal attack in place of an argument. I’m not criticizing you for being mean - I’m criticizing you for sidestepping the discussion entirely.

      If you think critics of wokeness are wrong, then show why. Don’t just insult them and pretend that counts as insight.