• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “I paid $70 on console and they got it on PC for free!”

    Hold off buying games for a while and you’ll be able to get them ALL for free on your new gaming PC!

    (How many games would they have to not buy? 15? 20?)

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      15 games for $70 are enough to save $1000, which is definitely enough for a good gaming PC. After buying a PS5 and the cheapest PS Plus subscription, paid yearly (cause that’s the cheapest option per month) for a little more than 8 years, you’re also at $1000. With the most expensive PS Plus option it would only take a little more than 4 years.

  • Raphaël A. Costeau@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And that didn’t make sense in this case, almost no one pirates games with online multiplayer, even if it has a single-player mode

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Back when I was maybe seven years old I went to this kids birthday party. I got him an ant farm with tubes.

    Later on when all the kids were playing together in his room without adults, he pulled a tube out of ant farm box, he shoved one end up his ass and then started sucking on the other end.

    It’s nice to know that he is still alive and tweeting.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m having a hard time envisioning the flexibility required to make that work. It couldn’t have been both at the ends at the same time? Also, did this kid just get naked in front of everyone at their party? To each their own, I guess.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The clear plastic tubing was packaged in a roll, to be cut at whatever length the ant farmer wanted, so it was long enough to do standing up.

        He didn’t get naked, just put his hand down his pants. It was evident that he placed it either on his butthole, or up it, based on the effort he was taking.

        • Vent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ah, that makes sense. I was thinking more like a mini-m&m tube.

  • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    In case anyone actually wants to know a couple of reasons

    A) It’s not fair that some people pay and some don’t. (Of course it’s also not fair that some can afford $70 on a video game and some struggle to buy food)

    B) If everyone would pay then we’d all only have to pay $50 each, lowering the price for those that are paying $70 at the moment. (Whether developers would lower prices or just make more money is another question)

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’ll literally never lower prices. Look at what prices for everything are right now. Their excuse was that covid was driving up prices, now that covid is over they realized they could charge more so here we are.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thanks for trying to bring an alternative perspective to the table.

      Neither argument is very compelling. A) is like “if I can’t have nice things, no one can”, and think about those arguments against loan forgiveness or healthcare. B) is wishful thinking game companies will charge what people are willing to pay no matter how many copies are sold. And unlike physical goods, the cost per digital license doesn’t really much if more copies are sold so expected sales volume doesn’t affect costs much in that sense. Piracy itself also doesn’t incur any cost (other than mythical lost sales), while Denuvo and other anti circumvention technology does.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Naïveté. Its not devs that set the price. Publishers do not have your best interests in mind. They will always choose to make more money. They don’t give a fuck about literally anything else.

      The prices will never be lower. Purchasing no longer grants ownership. This is why piracy is justified in a lot of cases.

      Support devs that respect the community. Steal from those that don’t. Or even better, don’t play games whose publishers treat the community like shit.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    ‘It’s not fair that we keep getting scammed and others don’t’

    So just don’t give them money next time?

    ‘LALALALA I can’t hear you, it’s your fault not mine LALALALA’

  • Trincapinones@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The “it’s not fair we pay for these games for them to then be pirated” says it all, it’s not about the company becoming bankrupt because of piracy, it’s because they don’t want to feel bad once they have been scammed with a half made game that others have gotten for free. Because a half made game should be worthless

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What a strange mentality. When I pay for things I want, I’m generally happy to support the creator. If others can’t, why would I be upset if they get the product for free? It means more people can also enjoy the thing I like.

      It’s such a crab bucket mentality, I couldn’t imagine living life being constantly bitter.

      • Nithanim@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I certainly don’t care if others get the game other ways (except unauthorized key stores). I am just happy that good games get their recognition and give people joy. I am in the fortunate situation that I am able to just buy all games I want. Heck, I even bought games for friends who were unsure or even dismissive “if it would be worth it”. I also buy/bought games that I never played or won’t play but watched streamers play it.

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Some people are really weird when it comes to things being “fair.” I forget the details but I remember a study where given the option of getting $100 and a stranger getting $200, a good chunk of people would rather neither of them get anything.

        • groet@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is a famous experiment , where a person gets 100$, and have to offer an arbitrary percentage of that to a stranger. If the stranger declines, both get nothing.

          From the strangers perspective, getting offered even 1$ is a win, but the vast majority rejected anything below 30%

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I can think of a couple ways this post makes sense. For example, if Denuvo paid this commenter to make this post.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Fuck them, I’ve got mine” pro-capitalist mindset in the wild.

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    And then piracy will be the only way to play as people do NOT like to deal with Denuvo (and for good reason)

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wrong, I was that kid and I hate denuvo just like everybody else.

      Also I don’t think it works as an analogy, the kid reminding the teacher about homework does it because he likes school, and learning, he does it for himself and everybody else, he never imagine other kids would not like it. This guy doesn’t do this for himself or others, he does this out of spite of others, to punish people, he doesn’t gain anything.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I beg to differ. We made pretty sure that kid had absolutely no doubt that we did not want homework. If it was different for you, there must have been something huge at that school keeping you from getting a whooping every other day.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That’s what the commentor thinks too, he imagines all the good people who want a fair and sane world will cheer him on and the nasty criminals to slink off Into the night mubling how they’d have got away with it if it weren’t for that nobel hero saving the day for the good capitalist folk and their billionaire corporations.

    • UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love this anology so much. It’s something everyone can relate to. It’s something so incredibly low and despised that you can’t understand why it exists, but it’s also so very common.

      • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why would they ? I was that kid and I still upvoted his comment, I don’t use downvote as a disagree/punish button, I only use it for agressive/uninteresting comment. I think we should upvote any comment that create interesting discussion, even if we disagree with the core message.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you ride a bus without a ticket, other passengers will have to pay more because upkeep and salaries are more or less a fixed cost. That is if you can afford the ticket, it’s irrelevant otherwise. Also depends on profit margins but I think it explains the point.

    • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Except that’s not even how most bus systems work because most of them are majority funded by taxes with fares originally meant to serve as a stopgap but then slowly converted into a profit engine (usually after privitization). Fares are a way to gatekeep a service which your taxes already pay for, which I would argue, is by itself a form of theft.

      As an example check out the latest MTA report only 26% of funding comes from fares, and that ones a bit in the higher end from what I’ve seen (NYC public transit, picked as the example a it’s recently been in the news for issues with fare evasion)

      All that aside, it’s also worth noting that fare increases are extremely unpopular and it’s not that easy to increase them without potential serious backlash (ie the mass protests in Chile a few years back that were in part set off by the fare hikes.)

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was merely explaining how one comes to this line of thinking which is what OP was asking about. I also mentioned some holes in this logic so I think it’s clear it’s not an opinion I actually hold.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If no-one pirated any Sony game do you think they would.

      A) Lower the price of the game to maintain their existing profit margin.
      B) Set a lower price that increases their margin.
      C) Keep the higher price and just make a fuck ton more money.

    • HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not necessarily. The bus will still operate, if you ride on it or not. The cost is the same.
      If say 20% of passengers don’t pay and you have to get more buses and drivers because of that. Then it’ll affect prices.

      Just as pirating Netflix movies without ever having the intention of paying for them is the same outcome as not watching them.
      Maybe worse for Netflix since you won’t tell your friends about it. There are studies that prove this effect.