Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agoJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squaregaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 hours agoBecause books are used to train both commercial and open source language models?
minus-squareSentient Loom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 hours ago used to train both commercial commercial training is, in this case, stealing people’s work for commercial gain and open source language models so, uh, let us train open-source models on open-source text. There’s so much of it that there’s no need to steal. ? I’m not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement.
minus-squaregaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·30 minutes ago I’m not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. I was questioning whether or not you would see that as a benefit. Clearly you don’t. Are you also against libraries letting people borrow books since those are also lost sales for the authors, or are you just a luddite?
Because books are used to train both commercial and open source language models?
commercial training is, in this case, stealing people’s work for commercial gain
so, uh, let us train open-source models on open-source text. There’s so much of it that there’s no need to steal.
I’m not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement.
I was questioning whether or not you would see that as a benefit. Clearly you don’t.
Are you also against libraries letting people borrow books since those are also lost sales for the authors, or are you just a luddite?