foremanguy@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWhich file system do you recommend for Linux?message-squaremessage-square134linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareWhich file system do you recommend for Linux?foremanguy@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square134linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoBtrfs is slower than ext4, xfs, and f2fs in pretty much every metric. Noticeably slower app opening times is the reason I switched to F2FS for good.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoEdit: BTRFS has advantages that likely make it better for me. It has compression and allows flexible partition sizes. The compression may explain the speed decreases.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoCompression might be useful in some cases, but the bulk of my data is already compressed or not much compressible (think videos, images, compressed archives, game assets). So the trade off doesn’t make much sense to me.
Btrfs is slower than ext4, xfs, and f2fs in pretty much every metric. Noticeably slower app opening times is the reason I switched to F2FS for good.
Edit: BTRFS has advantages that likely make it better for me.
It has compression and allows flexible partition sizes. The compression may explain the speed decreases.
Compression might be useful in some cases, but the bulk of my data is already compressed or not much compressible (think videos, images, compressed archives, game assets). So the trade off doesn’t make much sense to me.