• Hours after the US airstrike on Iranian territory, Iranian-backed hackers took down US President Donald Trump’s social media platform.
  • Users were struggling to access Truth Social in the early morning following the alleged hack.
  • As the US continues to insert itself into the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, the US government believes more cyberattacks could happen.
  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    they have to start differentiating a ddos attack from an actual breach. one is far more interesting than the other

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I work in tech and I hate it when non-security people talk about it.

      It’s really painful to read about “a new hack that can affect billions of accounts” from a source, only to learn its some new social phishing method.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    LOL sure, am I supposed to believe a backward country populated by fools, borrowed the washing machine from a country populated by drunks, to access the internet long enough to troll a country run by a buffoon?

    Pull the other leg!

      • saruwatarikooji@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s been tried. A huge percentage of the internet runs on Amazon web services… And a massive ddos attack on that barely bumped it beyond the level of holiday shopping.

        To get anywhere on “taking down the internet” they’d probably have to physically take out many sites across the globe.

        • abdominable@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          You say this like the hour all major SAAS went down 2 weeks ago was nothing. MILLIONS lost in business hours is not nothing.

              • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Feeling concern for the welfare of a corporation is a lot like caring for a lion or some other large predator. You don’t want to see it suffer but you know that it could turn on you at any moment, when it’s convenient for them.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m still at a loss for words thinking that any real human people joined truth social. We really failed as a species…

    • Sinthesis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The word “hack” is pre-internet. A “hack” journalist or a “hack job” is basically something unprofessional. It is movies that turned “hackers” into someone that gained access to the “mainframe”. In the realm of computer systems, I would argue that a “hack” is doing anything the system was not intended/designed to do. A successful DoS or DDoS needs to find some component of the system that wasn’t designed to handle the amount of traffic about to be sent to it.

      There are protections for DDoS (iptables, fail2ban, Cloudflare and so on), you have to figure out a way around them, that’s a hack.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d start with the following, and refine if necessary:

        “Gaining unauthorized access to a protected computer resource by technical means.”

        • Port scanning --> Not hacking because there isn’t any access to resources gained*
        • Using default passwords that weren’t changed --> Not hacking because the resource wasn’t protected*
        • Sending spam --> Not hacking because there isn’t any access to resources gained
        • Beating the admin with a wrench until he tells you the key --> Not hacking because it’s not by technical means.
        • Accessing teacher SSN’s published on the state website in the HTML --> Not hacking because the resource wasn’t protected, and on the contrary was actively published**
        • Distributed denial of service attack --> Not hacking because there isn’t any access to resources gained

        * Those first two actually happened in 2001 here in Switzerland when the WEF visitors list was on a database server with default password, they had to let a guy (David S.) go free
        ** The governor and his idiot troupe eventually stopped their grandstanding and didn’t file charges against Josh Renaud of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter, luckily

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          When my parents kicked me out, the number of times o got to sleep inside because i could convince people i was the county password inspector was more than zero. It’s hacking.

          Wrench? No. But an old colleague informs me that the version done with a machete does count as hacking. I concur.

          Those are both way more useful than exploiting a lazy coder’s fuckup, renaming ‘house of many backdoors’ to ‘that package everyone uses in everything’ on github, or some fancy math shit.

          Your laws are nonsense bullshit, they’re just excuses for power and I’d appreciate you not defiling language fof the rest of us to justify them.

          • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Those are both way more useful than exploiting a lazy coder’s fuckup

            I never said social engineering, physical breaching, exerting force on people, and other ways of compromising systems weren’t useful. They just aren’t hacking to me, otherwise the term is too broad to be very useful.

            You’re free to come up with your own definition, I was asked to define it and that’s my best shot for now.

            • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think a better definition would be “achieve something in an unintended or uncommon way”. Fits the bill on what generally passes in the tech community as a “hack” while also covering some normal life stuff.

              Getting a cheaper flight booked by using a IP address assigned to a different geographical location? Sure I’d call that a life hack. Getting a cheaper flight by booking a late night, early morning flight? No, those are deliberately cheaper

              Also re: your other comment about not making a reply at all, sometimes for people like us it’s just better to not get into internet fights over semantics (no matter how much fun they can be)

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh man.

          My comment was intended to imply that the term “hacking” defies definition because it has been grossly overused and misconstrued over many decades.

          Sure you might be able to convey what it means to you but of course it means different things to everyone else, with each definition being equally appropriate.

          Er go, any discussion is one of semantics.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Mailing someone more letters than they’re capable of replying to is not equivalent to, nor a component of, gaining access to the inside of their home.

        • pachrist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean, I know JK Rowling sucks, and it’s been a long time since the first Harry Potter movie came out, but it was definitely a component and precursor to Hagrid beating the shit out of that door.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            To be fair, they had moved to an unsecure location that was a much softer target by that point. Can a DDOS force someone to move their services over to the equivalent of a century old, weather-beaten lighthouse in the middle of England?

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Disabling network security and edge devices to change the properties of ingress can absolutely be a component of an attack plan.

          Just like overwhelming a postal sorting center could prevent a parcel containing updated documentation from reaching the receiver needing that information.

          • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I haven’t heard of a firewall failing open when overwhelmed yet. Usually quite the opposite, a flood disables access to more than just the targeted device, when the state table overflows.

            But maybe there is a different mechanism I’m not aware of. How would the DDoS change the properties of ingress?

            • theherk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              By denying access to resources in a primary region, one might force traffic to an alternate infrastructure with a different configuration. Or maybe by overwhelming hosts that distribute BGP configurations. By denying access to resources, sometimes you can be routed to resources with different security postures or different monitoring and alerting, thus not raising alarms. But these are just contrived examples.

              Compromising devices is a wide field with many different tools and ideas, some of which are a bit off the wall and nearly all unexpected, necessarily.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I bet it’s the US.
    They’re already starting the 💀Iranian sleeper cell terrorists!!!😱 scaremongering in the press.
    These kinds of reports in the media are the first step in a known pattern of priming and nudging to rally up the public for another war.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Thankfully only DDos. Truth Social is Mastodon so a security flaw could have been a real problem.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Never saw security flaw now as a real problem. You just have to live with the fact that there is one. And you will suffer when it’s used. Security flaw later is a real problem.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      nah it’s a lazy fork so seeing how he chooses people (they’re either cheap or friends of friends or both) “truth” can easily have a totally new security issue

      maybe the server has a root password that’s “trump454748$$$”

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is a modified version of Mastodon, with a Soapbox front end. It does not have ActivityPub enabled and lacks a bunch of features.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The Mastodon developers then formally requested that Truth Social comply with the terms of the software license,[75] with Truth Social publishing its source code as a ZIP file on the website on November 12, 2021.

          Lol they actually complied with the license in the end, i didnt know that.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not really. Most people around the world are pretty much in the same boat. The “leaders” of governments try to propagandize differences, but everyone is living the same shitty existence. Elites vs poors across the globe. Occasionally you get groups that are extremely radical, but it’s not specific really to any country (We see a lot of out of the ME and Africa mostly due to prolonged Colonial abuse, admittedly.)

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Hacker group”.

      What a joke. Any kid with a credit card can unleash a ddos attack on a website.

      An irrelevant website none the less. If that pile of shit goes down then the entire world benefits.

        • MehBlah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Iran is known for its barbaric treatment of women who refuse the forced muslim dress code. They are a equally corrupt government. No good people involved at the upper levels. SSDD.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            While there are religious extremists in Iran, their level of influence on Iranian culture is not anywhere near what you’re saying. You’re just repeating western propaganda.

            They did have a controversial new dress code law that was supposed to go into effect at the end of last year, but it was blocked for being to extreme and vague.

            However, my state just forced a brain dead woman to incubate a baby against the family’s will. So I’m inclined to agree with those saying the religious extremists exercise greater control in the US than Iran, and by your standards that means they should bomb us. Because I guess you think killing people is equal to freeing them.

            • MehBlah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              You are stretching that one out. I don’t support Israel any more than I support Iran. They are both trash.

              • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                You’re repeating Israeli lies. So you’re either surreptitiously supporting Israel, or you’re serving as a useful idiot.

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            LOL
            The literal hasbara operative excuse to excuse them for genociding those misanthrophic barbarian Palestinians.
            Really, you’re all so boring and unimaginative.
            Must be tiring defending the many many warcrimes from USSA/pissrahell.
            Glad you’re getting youe ass kicked and turning into Gaza yourself, it warms my heart.

          • fantoozie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah good thing the US respects women’s autonomy and isn’t being strangled by a fundamentalist religious movement that wants to force women to be nothing more than incubators, maids, and fuck toys…😒

            • MehBlah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Most of us do respect womens autonomy. I know I taught my daughter that. The loud mouth weaklings don’t. They hate that women don’t have to spread on command.

              • fantoozie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                I couldnt give a single flying fuck if “most of you” are such good people that you’d willingly live in a militant feminist matriarchy; the fact is our enemy is not Iran or it’s people and you’re here patting yourself on the ass for having the literal minimum level of decency expected of a father

              • fantoozie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Different doesn’t necessarily equate to worse. The IR does oppress women, without a doubt; but American society exploits young women’s sexuality for financial gain, psychologically manipulates them into prohibitive gender norms that are impossible to achieve without vast amounts of wealth and privilege, and then tells them the most important thing they can aspire to be is mother to a man’s offspring.

                In short, you, your society, and your government are not as different-and clearly not any better-from any other in the world.

                • Sl00k@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  A lot of this comment hinges on your belief that US women are not intelligent enough to to understand that exploitation and manipulation. Knowledge has progressed a lot in the last 20 years. Look at the under 18 and 20-24 age groups here

                  There are much better examples of the subjugation of women in the US right now than to pin the societal oppression on US’ fostering of an anti intellectual society.

              • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Iran has more FEMALE engineers than the US and less of it’s population in jail.
                Iran’s healthcare has been rated excellent by UNICEF.
                I could continue, but facts can’t win from the propaganda machine online.
                So I’m just gonna laugh make fun of it.

                • Sl00k@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  The freedom of both women and the general public is not solely dictated by healthcare and the ability to attain higher education.

                  Does a free society cut off country wide access to the external internet?

                  Iran is actively lying to its citizens saying they destroyed the US base in Qatar and there was minimal damage to Iranian nuclear facilities. Both outright lies. This is not a free golden society.

                  How many women are persecuted from laws around the head dressing and other clothing related issues.

                  Boiling womens rights down to they can become an engineer and have good healthcare is laughably pathetic and on the verge of being a conservative talking point I would hear on fox news in justification for stripping away more rights. Pinning the struggle of US women against Iranian women is an incredibly pathetic mindset that only fosters negativity.

            • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Solid-State Disk Drive, it’s a regular hard drive with the platters hot-glued to stay still

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                That’s right. The platters are heavy, and the reader head is light, so we just whip the reader head around at 7200rpm

        • MehBlah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The only problem is that felon 47 isn’t going to fight. Innocent americans are going to get killed and that disgusting psychopath is going to spit on their graves.

          • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            What innocent Americans are you talking about? If trade ships are attacked, maybe. If it’s military personnel, none of them are innocent as they are still “following orders”.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah it will indiscriminately hurt Iranians and Americans and not our rulers. We were both already suffering under our leaders before the American government decided to go to war with Iran.

            I may need to go reread Jingo…

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Innocent Americans don’t wear the US fascist army uniform.
            I will spit on their grave.

            Solet the downvoting, bootlicking and whitewashing begin.
            You’ll have to be creative, not this tired garbage:

              • MehBlah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Its a pretty childish take. Somehow my statement just wasn’t good enough. Not enough black and white. Too much grey.

              • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                “I didn’t personally bomb weddings or hospitals, I only made a cog for the missile” doesn’t excuse them.
                So yes, they can all go to hell

          • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            He would have to even think about them to do that. I doubt the ground level costs of his actions and choices ever enter his mind in any real way.