Ah yea, def true, because race has never been used to harm or disenfranchise anyone. They’re just babies playing victim about all that so-called “redlining”, “slavery”, “lynching”, and “ongoing police brutality”. The police definitely treat us all equally. Good point! /s
Is this the part where you display that you don’t understand data science techniques and spout debunked stuff like “12% commit 90% of crimes!” And due to bullshit asymmetry I then have to teach you all statistical techniques for you to understand why it’s incorrect?
Possibly so.
When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned.
Relative references in language is confusing!
Ah yea, def true, because race has never been used to harm or disenfranchise anyone. They’re just babies playing victim about all that so-called “redlining”, “slavery”, “lynching”, and “ongoing police brutality”. The police definitely treat us all equally. Good point! /s
Is this the part where you display that you don’t understand data science techniques and spout debunked stuff like “12% commit 90% of crimes!” And due to bullshit asymmetry I then have to teach you all statistical techniques for you to understand why it’s incorrect?
Meh, stay dumb. The world needs some dumb people.
They may have meant that “race card” is real and “victim cars” is not. But I still don’t think that is a valid point
Possibly so.
When they say the “first” I cannot tell if they mean the first one I mentioned or the first one they mentioned.
Relative references in language is confusing!
Technically, for referencing the previous parts there are “former” and “latter”, but you never know if it was not used intentionally or not.