The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

  • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    I’m a little confused why this is in the news. First off, it’s just a House Resolution. It’s has no legally binding repercussions. It’s basically the House of Representatives as a group making a statement: “We don’t like anti-Semitism”. The definition of anti-Semitism they decided to point to is the thing that’s really in contention. But again, this affects nobody but the US House of Representatives.

    Secondly, the vote on this took place in December. So it seems kind of late to be raging over it.

    Full text of the resolution: https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hres894/BILLS-118hres894ih.pdf
    Summary of action: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/894/all-info

    If you’re in the US and it really bugs you, I’d suggest looking up how your district representative voted and let them know how you feel about it.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      It would also help if more than a handful of people in the House knew semitic is a pretty archaic term and would include Palestinians in Gaza as well as Israelis and people from several other countries as well.

      Protected classes are race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, gender, citizenship, disability or veteran, family status or generic information. Nobody gets protections for genocide.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      Only free for zionists and the corporations. You know, the wealthy people. Not for the silly plebes.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 年前

    This would make more sense if Israel weren’t actively being nazis right now! Like, if they weren’t being nazis, it’d be really annoying to get called a nazi when you aren’t being a nazi, but these guys… i mean, they’re kinda just being nazis, there’s not really two ways about it. Admittedly the palestinians are hitting back harder than the jews were able to at the time, but trying to wipe people out is kinda enough to get called a nazi, and rightly so, even if they are defending themselves however poorly

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      Admittedly the palestinians are hitting back harder than the jews were able to at the time,

      No they are not. A few Israelis killed here and there is not “harder”. Just modern weapons are different.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    Are all Israelis Jewish? The US is such a fucking joke at this point. And it’s tedious to block community after community on lemmy to avoid the noise of vapidness. Good luck with your fucked up politics.

    PS: I’d recommend excluding US specific news from “world news”. Not sure if this stuff is moderated, or if those who do, give af about it.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      Being Jewish is not the same as being Zionist. One of them has Nazi moral intent, and it’s not the Jews that oppose Zionism.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      3/4 are Jewish which is an overwhelming majority but I also think there are great reasons to separate the classifications of Israeli and Jew. Mainly because the state is not led by the religion but instead by elected leaders.

      Though that separation of church and state does seem to be diminishing as Bibi and his far right ultraorthodox cronies do seem to be slowly turning it into more of an authoritarian state.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      The politics of the global hegemon affects the entire world, as much as we hate it. Specially when it’s regarding a country they’re currently committing genocide in.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 年前

    What the fuck?

    Fuck zionists and their disproportionate amount of control over the world.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      Good thing their silly religious stories will never come true.

      Imagine being disappointed for eternity.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        Zionism is a racist colonial ideology, merely using religion as a tool. Theodor Herzl, founder of zionism, said so himself

        “We should there form a portion of a rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilization as opposed to barbarism. We should as a neutral State remain in contact with all Europe, which would have to guarantee our existence.” Source [II]

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 年前

          It used religion simply as a component of typical XIX-century romantic nationalism. It was a secular ideology until the last 10-20 years.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 年前

    Wonder what other things they’ll make illegal to compare to Nazis. Cause once your banning disparaging speech, why stop there?

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      As heavily as they’re censoring outlets to the point a tiktok ban suddenly isn’t laughable, I’m surprised they didn’t pass a law making calling it genocide a hate crime.

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 年前

    So it’s ok to call students that are protesting against a genocide Nazis but not the people actually committing the genocide. Got it.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      That’s what modern Nazis do - try very hard to defame their opponents as Nazis. Sometimes even their victims. Then any argument from that side is disadvantaged.

      Why the fuck I’m even writing this here, it’s obvious, only unless I find a way to kill some bad people doing this, I won’t help things.

    • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      It’s OK to call anyone not aligned with the Republican Party a Nazi, because it’s important that words have no real meaning. Once words have no meaning, the ideas behind them fade as well. This is double plus ungood.

  • Binthinkin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 年前

    Zionists are also thieves because they are buying stolen Gaza land.

    I have sat at passover with Zionists and they are the dumbest shittiest people just like the crazy evangelicals. Just shit people.

    Good luck on getting them to admit any type of fault.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 年前

      Nazi rhetoric already fits the definition of antisemitism though.

      Calling for a divestment of Israel isn’t being made illegal or even defined as antisemitism by this bill, so both examples don’t really make sense.