This is just lazy journalism. Like, yes, it’s statistically interesting how many people attended, but not of particular news value. If you’re looking at the photos from across the country and thinking, “OK, but what’s the precise number,” the forest is being missed for the trees.
People seem to have fetishized the posited 3.5% figure where movements gain traction. When millions show up to demonstrate, rounding to the nearest hundred thousand isn’t the story.
This has prompted, inside my mind, a request based on your critical thinking skills. And please take a few days to look over and think about the content.
I was exposed to the following back in 2008 and have been pondering about it since then. What is your take?
This is just lazy journalism. Like, yes, it’s statistically interesting how many people attended, but not of particular news value. If you’re looking at the photos from across the country and thinking, “OK, but what’s the precise number,” the forest is being missed for the trees.
People seem to have fetishized the posited 3.5% figure where movements gain traction. When millions show up to demonstrate, rounding to the nearest hundred thousand isn’t the story.
This has prompted, inside my mind, a request based on your critical thinking skills. And please take a few days to look over and think about the content.
I was exposed to the following back in 2008 and have been pondering about it since then. What is your take?
https://derrickjensen.org/endgame/premises/