• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    “I mean sure, the baby died, but I really wouldn’t have known what to do at all without chatGPT! At least it gave me the proper procedure to follow after they died. Who knew you needed to make a post to eBay for a sale of used parts? I guess that’s a medical code or something. I should ask ChatGPT!”

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Calling him successful is technically true, but it kind of glosses over some very pertinent details of his success. He’s a billionaire, and you don’t get to be a billionaire without doing a lot of monstrous things to good people.

              The surprise isn’t whether he’s good looking enough to get a partner. The surprise is over the fact that there’s another human being who thinks that those are qualities worth overlooking, especially one who’s queer, since billionaires like Sam Altman support the current regime that’s wholly against LGBTQ+ folks. And that same person with questionable tastes in partners wanted to take care of another human being with Sam Altman.

                • Ledericas@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  doesnt look like it, elon has a breeding eugenics fetish. he has a breeding fetish like that 17bn-aire that just announced he will give his inhertience to his 100+children.

              • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Saying someone’s is successful is not a moral judgement or approval of their character. Sam Altman is successful, Elon Musk is successful, all of these billionaires that built companies that have changed the world for better or wrong are all successful. This in no way means that I’m saying they’re good people or even that they are people that should be emulated or any other sort of moral judgement.

            • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Successful is debatable. There’s no question he is financially successful, but he fails at every metric I personally measure success by: Honesty, integrity, loyalty, and kindness. I’m not saying my metric is the correct one by any means, just that the definnition of success varies across humanity.

              • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                Anything is debatable. I could debate that the sky is not blue of if I wanted to. I’m debating you right now.

                He is successful by the metrics in which society measures success and that’s all I meant by that.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    That makes sense—being raised by ChatGPT might be marginally better than being raised by Sam Altman.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I asked ChatGPT how Sam Altman would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT:

    Sam Altman would’ve taken care of his baby the same way the rest of us did before his chatbot existed—by learning, asking, fumbling, caring, and figuring it out like a goddamn human.

    Altman’s quote—“I don’t know how I would’ve done that”—feels less like a reflection on parenthood and more like an unintentional glimpse into the kind of disconnection that can happen when you believe your product is the answer to everything.

    Of course, he’s not wrong that AI can be useful. But if your first thought when your newborn won’t sleep is to consult ChatGPT, that says more about your priorities than it does about parenthood.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      the rest of us

      feels […] like

      See even ChatGPT can emulate self-awareness better than Sam Altman.

  • seven_phone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Well every other person that ever existed was raised without ChatGPT being necessary so just ask anyone.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    On the one hand he’s supposed to be a very serious business genius at the forefront of the next wave of technological advancement. On the other, he’s just advertising to people how stupid he is.