• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Deorbiting is all well and good, but more and more we’re finding that these satellites contain chemicals that are very disruptive to the ozone layer. It’s going to be CFCs all over again, but with even more corporate capture of government.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s a fair point. The alternative is taking things up to a “graveyard orbit” somewhere between LEO and GSO, to a particularly unpopular altitude, where nobody’s fighting for real estate. Satellites can sit there indefinitely, you could even clump them up in a big ball, the tiny pull of gravity they have is actually enough to keep them bunched together.

      The only problem with that plan is that it takes a lot of energy to raise an orbit that much, I’m not sure how to make that feasible.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The only problem with that plan is that it takes a lot of energy to raise an orbit that much, I’m not sure how to make that feasible.

        Lowering the orbit takes energy, too, unless you’re relying solely on atmospheric drag.