Would be a weird magazine if every story had to be a watergate level expose or it wouldn’t be printed
Hey. That sounds an awful lot like “Logic” We don’t do that here.
very fitting from corpo bots
I dunno. Lightly Entertainment is in my experience part of most larger News Papers. And it had been the past decades. Especially in the feuilleton. I mean, you cant pull a watergate out of your hat everyday. And a news paper has a lot of pages to be printed
To be fair just investigate politicians and billionaries, surely you can find something
For me, it’s “Does this have a practical function?”, and if no, then “Would I evacuate with this in a disaster?”
and by “evacuate” i mean “poop”
Watergate was covered by journalists; these “articles” are written by clickbait engagement employees.
I think the movie “The Post” did a good job highlighting the corruption within journalists/media as well. It’s not a historical accurate retelling people ensure to point out but it addresses how individuals get tied into closer relationships with politicians which gets them scoops which inevitably make them more money and promotions, but those can be tied to not asking the hard questions, and not wanting to hurt ties/friendships they form along the way.
Then again, most Tom Hanks movies end up being pretty good. Movies like “A Man Called Otto” always surprise me.
I too love consumerism so much. let’s all talk about things we buy and love to keep, that’s a very organic conversation.
One could argue the article is anti consumerist since its talking about de cluttering, albeit in a weird way. At least, that’s what I’m assuming. As for organic conversation, beats “did you see [sports game] last night”. But that’s just me.
Keeping my buttplug collection, I guess.
I’ve now thrown out all my toothbrushes and toilet paper. My fridge and pantry have been emptied entirely, and the bookshelf has been purged. Maybe this wasn’t the best approach.
Ah yes, the Marie Kondo method
I love that bitch but the upper middle class people on her Netflix show was big yikes.
Obviously I felt sad for the one with the dead husband - I’m not a monster
She looks like if gemma from severance wasn’t meant to be a sci fi character. And no, not like the actress. And no, I don’t just mean bc of the ethnicity plus hair (also she is Nepali!)
So whether or not something should be kept depends on how easy it is to clean? That seems kinda dumb.
More like “would I spend my life cleaning this instead of throwing it away”. You have to be the type of person to not want to clean everything covered in shit though
You have to be the type of person to not want to clean everything covered in shit though
Ah there lies the fault in the method
Works on most people that aren’t stage 5 hoarders really
Yes, among other scandals. That’s why it has been captured and is being debased. The Washington Post is now like Hector’s corpse being dragged and abused in grisly triumph, except there’s no Aphrodite to keep it from rotting.
Time to throw away all the food.
Instructions unclear, ive shit in my cupboard.
"I shit in a urinal
In other words I’m saying I don’t care"
There goes everything in the fridge and pantry.
I have a one and half year rule. If I haven’t used it for more than 1 and a half years, it’s trash.
That doesn’t apply to the spare cable box, obviously.
ಠ_ಠ
I can’t do that. :( I’m often wanting a part for a project or just the right thing for, whatever. FFS, I save broken glass for when I need to cut it down to fix something.
How do you cut glass?
it’s remarkably simple actually, you just score it with a cutter and then break the glass at the scoring point
Another loose rule I have is to fill the trash can each week. If it’s not completely full I try to find things to put into it.
