European Commission (@EU_Commission@social.network.europa.eu)
social.network.europa.eu
Attached: 1 image Our commitment to the fediverse is here to stay. We are working on a solution to ensure our continued presence on your feeds, taking full advantage of Mastodon's identity portability. And we are even growing the team behind our Mastodon presence, increasing efforts to engage with your comments on our posts. We are fully committed to being a real part of the conversation in the fediverse. Interested in our next steps? Follow us as we take on this new chapter.

EU :

Our commitment to the fediverse is here to stay.

We are working on a solution to ensure our continued presence on your feeds, taking full advantage of Mastodon’s identity portability.

And we are even growing the team behind our Mastodon presence, increasing efforts to engage with your comments on our posts.

We are fully committed to being a real part of the conversation in the fediverse.

Interested in our next steps? Follow us as we take on this new chapter.

/me : 🤔

  • TWeaK@lemm.eeEnglish
    0·
    6 months ago

    The question hasn’t been legally tested, it’s no more certain now than it was before.

    While it might be the case that the EU could come down on a user’s main instance for not deleting everywhere, really it’s no different to anywhere else - any app that uses an API or even just a simple scraper can get comments that a user posts, so as with those it could also simply fall to the user to go around each and every instance and request deletion. Arguably, the Fediverse is better than this because it does include a facility for deleting things from a host instance - the only issue is that the other instance might not necessarily follow that (as instances don’t necessarily run pure lemmy code, in fact they could run anything).