Instagram is profiting from several ads that invite people to create nonconsensual nude images with AI image generation apps, once again showing that some of the most harmful applications of AI tools are not hidden on the dark corners of the internet, but are actively promoted to users by social media companies unable or unwilling to enforce their policies about who can buy ads on their platforms.

While parent company Meta’s Ad Library, which archives ads on its platforms, who paid for them, and where and when they were posted, shows that the company has taken down several of these ads previously, many ads that explicitly invited users to create nudes and some ad buyers were up until I reached out to Meta for comment. Some of these ads were for the best known nonconsensual “undress” or “nudify” services on the internet.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Would it be any different if you learn how to sketch or photoshop and do it yourself?

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You say that as if photoshopping someone naked isnt fucking creepy as well.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Creepy to you, sure. But let me add this:

        Should it be illegal? No, and good luck enforcing that.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re at least right on the enforcement part, but I dont think the illegality of it should be as hard of a no as you think it is

      • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Creepy, maybe, but tons of people have done it. As long as they don’t share it, no harm is done.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I dont think that many have dude. Like sure, if you’re talking total number and not percentage, but this planet has so many people you could also claim that tons of people are pedophiles too

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Lol you’d be surprised…isn’t this one of those things people would do in private but never admit in public (because of people likr you getting all touchy and creeped out by it)?

            • Kedly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You say this like we SHOULDN’T be creeped out that you are digitally undressing someone without their permission

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          There is a massive difference between thoughts and action. I’m sure a significant portion of us have thought about murdering someone too, does that make actually going through with murder less bad?

          • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            This is a false equivalency. The correct analogy would be: if I think about murdering someone and then draw a picture of it or make a movie about murdering them, is that wrong?

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I am not saying anyone should do it and don’t need some internet stranger to police me thankyouverymuch.