• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I honestly think they have zero case here. The article just says stuff about reddit claiming that antrhopic doesn’t have reddit users’ consent and something about reddit being a le to defend their users.

    However U.S. law puts the copyright in the hands of the creator of it, NOT Reddit. I guess Reddit can cut IPs off, but I really don’t think they have a tort here.

    • Kissaki@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      However U.S. law puts the copyright in the hands of the creator of it, NOT Reddit.

      Users give Reddit a license to handle and publish the comments under their terms. I don’t remember the specific terms. It may allow Reddit to pursue this, specifically when the content is being consumed from Reddit.