Archive.

The key reason is that we just don’t have enough people on the admin team to keep the place running. Most of the admin team has stepped down, mostly due to burnout, and finding replacements hasn’t worked out.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    • Not providing a platform for activities that harm society (e.g. scams, disinformation).
    • Not providing a platform for activities that will get you sued or prosecuted (e.g. piracy, child porn).

    On social media, putting the burden of blocking on a million users is naive because:

    • Blocks can be worked around with bots, someone has to actively fight circimvention.
    • Some users don’t have the time to block, simply conclude “this is a hostile environment” and leave.
    • Some users fall for scams / believe the disinfo.

    I have once helped others build an anonymous mix network (I2P). I’m also an anarchist. On Lemmy however, support decentralization, defederating from instances that have bad policies or corrupt management, and harsh moderation. Because the operator of a Lemmy instance is fully exposed.

    Experience has shown that total freedom is a suitable policy for apps that support 1-to-1 conversations via short text messages. Everything else invites too much abuse. If it’s public, it will have rules. If it’s totally private, it can have total freedom.

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some users don’t have the time to block, simply conclude “this is a hostile environment” and leave.

      This exactly.

      As the anecdote puts it, once you start tolerating Nazis in your bar, it becomes a Nazi bar.

      They poison the space, and the regular folks leave.