• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        So you think

        0.333.... + 0.333.... + 0.333.... = 1

        Is clearer and more concise than

        1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1

        Fractional representation is the method for rational numbers, particularly if they are part of an intermediate calculation.

        Decimals are lossy, fractions aren’t.

        • axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No because you said this:

          If you want to precisely write to infinity you write 1/3.

          You can also precisely write to infinity if you write 0.333…

          Decimals are lossy, fractions aren’t.

          Decimals aren’t lossy, any fraction can be converted to decimal but it just takes longer to write.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            The fraction 1/3 is a compact and unambiguous representation—it doesn’t rely on an ellipsis or an understanding of infinite series to be interpreted. It can easily be used in later calculations (you never see … notation in algebra). It is a useful notation.

            As soon as you use decimals in computer and human calculations, they become lossy.

            I’m not really sure what hill you are trying to die on. Fractions are useful, even if you don’t know how to use them.

            • axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              As soon as you use decimals in computer and human calculations, they become lossy.

              What does lossy mean? I’m not trying to die on any hill, but I’m quite confused aswell.

    • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      well, no, it’s understood that a third is .333 to infinity, so .333+.333+.333 does equal 1 for any use not requiring precision to the point of it mattering that it was actually .33333335 when measured.

        • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It came from it not being actually .333 to infinity when measured in the required engineering precision i was talking about. It’s literally a “common use” mathematical convention (you clearly are unaware of) that three times .333 is one. Solves a lot of problems due to a failure of the notation.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            3 times 0.333 is 0.999 not 1.

            Saying it equals 1 may be a common engineering convention, but it is mathematically incorrect.

            There is no failure of notation if fractions are used, which is why I gave this example of usefulness.

            • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              You knows when a person informs you of a convention people use to solve a problem created by notation, you could just fucking learn instead of arguing stupidity.