• ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Because the only one who wins in a war is the military industrial complex, and they have fantastic lobbyists!

    • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If someone invaded your country and started murdering people you’d want to win the war.

      • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        What I’m saying is even the victors suffer the loss of many deaths thus the only winners are the military industrial complex supplying the arms and becoming enriched. Does that make more sense?

        Слава Україні!

        • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Solzhenitsyn said that there’s nothing worse for a country than to win a big war. This is filtered a little through my own perception, but the best I remember it was that winning a war teaches the lesson that all the maniacs were right and gives them all kinds of confidence to let them do more of the same, which never ends well at home or abroad. He said the usually if a country loses a big war, it comes out of it with some wisdom, and regards any maniacs at home or abroad with deep visceral suspicion from then on, which is as it should be.

      • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It makes me sad that they’re having to conscript the youth of Ukraine. What if it was my kid? What if it was me?

        I hope they can end this fast!

        • ginerel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The military-industrial complexes always have something to gain in wars (provided they manage to adapt in time). But there’s no other alternative industry that can supply the needed hardware to win a war, when an invasion happens. It just seems that’s all what our species can do best: kicking each other, then having a rest for a few dozen years and starting over.

          • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m not sure I understand your point. Are you trying to say that it being pro-war is a necessary evil? Are you assuming that the world would be less better off without powerful and breathtakingly enriched entities that thrive on war?

            I’m not saying I have all the answers but I don’t think I have to have all the answers to be against war or to be against the military industrial complex. Maybe that’s just me. 😁

            • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Some people think in simple binaries, and lump people into groups based on who they believe holds a certain view.

              Say anything negative about Israel, you must be pro-Hamas.

              Say anything negative about Biden, you must be pro-Trump.

              Say anything ‘negative’ about Ukraine (even something as simple as that Ukraine’s youth being conscripted and dying is horrible), you must be pro-Russia.