• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    First of all proprietary encryption is BS which should be equated to obfuscation instead of encryption.

    Second, I think I’ve addressed this:

    but their ads etc have pretty consistent emotional messages. Yes, they do endorse it.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      iMessage protocol has been fully implemented on Android devices before. The software is not obfuscated. It’s been thoroughly analyzed by competitors. Apple just doesn’t license it out. It’s proprietary IP.

      • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is just straight wrong. iMessage on android has worked by connecting to a remote Mac, which then connects to imessage. The protocol is locked to their hardware.

        And, even if there was a true open source reimplimplementation of iMessage, that would say nothing about the security of Apple’s proprietary implementation of the iMessage end to end encryption.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is like if a neural net had been fed Apple ads and Apple fans’ weird ideas on computing.

        Try to understand that imitating the way Apple PR talks doesn’t sound geeky, it sounds awfully ignorant.