The legal situation is more complex and nuanced than the headline implies, so the article is worth reading. This adds another ruling to the confusing case history regarding forced biometric unlocking.

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’ll be interesting to see if it applies to facial recognition. In iOS, at least, you need to look at the phone to unlock it. That’s an intentional action. If you look to the side or close your eyes, it won’t work.

    So if you’re conscious, you can’t easily be forced to unlock the phone with your face and eyes if you’re able to resist. But if you’re unconscious, then maybe they could use your face (assuming your eyes aren’t rolled back into your head because the cops gave you brain damage.)

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      But you can be easily tricked. Even easier than with the fingerprint.

      “Hey, can you look at those pictures?”, shows some printed out pictures with the phone hiding behind and then quickly just dropping the pictures.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        then quickly just dropping the pictures

        Could even poke a camera-sized hole in the picture. And disguise it by putting that hole over something similarly-coloured.

        But anyway, but of it is really that you can be held in contempt for refusing to unlock with biometrics, if they’ve got an appropriate warrant.

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Probably a “have a look at this” and the 2 seconds before you realize that you are currently unlocking your phone, would be enough.