• Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If the fight starts when you’re already at a close range melee weapons have a very decent chance of coming out on top over firearms. Maybe not the sock but bats and knives definitely.

      • Zenith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The loser of the knife fight dies at the scene the winner dies on the way to the hospital

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Knives have an advantage at close range at causing potentially fatal damage vs a gun, but a gun can still kill you if you don’t gain control of the muzzle. With a common pocket knife, your best bet is a fatal throat stab or slash to ending the threat because anywhere else you can’t reach or won’t act fast enough. Maybe you can disable an arm if you can separate a muscle or sever a tendon in the forearm, but we are getting into experienced knife combat there. Not that knives are relevant, we were talking bats and a sock with coins.

        A gun would easy win against someone with a bat or coins in a sock, the gunman only has to get in contact range to reduce swing force or get out of contact range. The bat or sock with coins is a 3-4ft radius of danger, the gun basically has range dependant on skill.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          A gun would easy win against someone with a bat or coins in a sock

          After being hit with a bat, I’d wager about 2 in 5 people would still even be holding their gun. If the bat hits the gun, hand, arm or head, 0 in 5 are still holding that gun.

          Now that’s assuming the bat gets a swing in, but in close quarters it’s entirely possible.