Fuck me. Took me 2-weeks to block all the child porn, AKA “anime” on here. About the same time frame to block all the comms involving anime dog fucking, AKA “yiff”. Still creeps in all the time, like a game of Whack a Mole.
Look at this shit, tell me it isn’t child porn.
https://old.lemmy.world/post/30407660#c17329413
LOL, and you people lambasted me for saying 17-year olds aren’t children. Not even starting on all the cutesy anime lesbian porn, no doubt posted by basement neckbeards who have never touched a female human.
And, let me check my notes, we want to grow this space, get more people in here?
I’m the last man to get on my moral high horse, but, to repeat myself: Fuck me.
EDIT: I should just keep tacking on shit I find and watch you pedos stumble around defending it.
Here’s more little girls, no nudity, “nothing suggestive”. I can do this all day. And that’s after having blocked shitloads of comms.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/130840034
https://ani.social/pictrs/image/0181954e-3fd8-466f-a489-9324cb1df92a.webp
https://media.kbin.earth/63/ac/63acf7c8260360958ec05d172d6ce38a19c46a94d6b520e796d50d5f39998ceb.jpg
Fuck it. Here’s a pile I haven’t blocked yet. Wonder why so many are marked NSFW?
https://old.lemmy.world/c/thighdeology@ani.social
If you think these are all innocent little girl pics (can’t believe I typed that out), nothing to see here, let’s see you post to a wider audience and ask, “Is this sexually suggestive?” Dare ya. Shown to the right audience, Lemmy would be front-page news in an instant.
(At least the dog fuckers haven’t stepped up to defend themselves. Waiting patiently…)
You think pictures of children is porn? If that’s the case, you maybe the one with the problem. There is nothing sexual in the image you linked.
Bullshit that’s not suggestive. That’s like saying when the Nazi bois type “1488”, it doesn’t mean the first 14 letters of the white national phrase and “heil Hitler”. It’s a dog whistle. Nearly all anime is a sexualized cartoon, even when there is no nudity. Downvote me if you want, but I agree with OP, especially when it’s in a sub with other sexualized or R34 crap.
It is 100% suggestive.
I see it’s a popular tactic to accuse the whistleblowers as being the ones with the real problem, which is a bullshit attempt to suppress discourse on the topic. I have another idea: that maybe those who claim that this picture isn’t sexual have been overexposed to much harder child sexual content, and as a result this picture doesn’t register on their radar. Speaking as someone who has not been exposed to any child sexual material, this is immediately, obviously meant to titillate.