• CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    No one is buying your bogus goods, man. The free speech affectation is meaningless when the platform kowtows to any authoritarian’s request for censorship or engages in its own algorithmic manipulation of your feed.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      They operate within the law. If a government says you either ban an account in their country or you stop providing your service to the entire country, which do you think X should do? Because those are the options - follow the law or exit the country.

      X are challenging the government legal orders in court btw, but in the meantime they have to cooperate. Like I said, the government are the ones censoring free speech here, not X. Do you but see the difference? To operate in a country you need to follow their laws. Not every country has free speech constitutionally guaranteed btw.