The only named defendant in the Anna's Archive 'WorldCat' hacking lawsuit suggests that the plaintiffs are going after the wrong person.

The only named defendant in the Anna’s Archive ‘WorldCat’ hacking lawsuit suggests that the plaintiffs are going after the wrong person.

  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    7 months ago

    The defense adds that the similarity between defendant’s social media handle, ‘anarchivist’, and Anna’s Archive is insufficient to support the claims. The same applies to other facts, including her previous occupation as a catalog librarian.

    They’re grasping at straws. Viva Anna’s Archive.

      • capem@startrek.websiteEnglish
        0·
        7 months ago

        Lady?

        Lol. First rule about the undernet: anyone with a female handle is actually a male.

        It’s actually a pretty good tactic to throw off investigators.

        • BreakDecks@lemmy.mlEnglish
          0·
          7 months ago

          Your misogyny has been noted.

          But the lady being referred to here is Maria Dolores Anasztasia Matienzo of Seattle, WA, who is being falsely accused of running Anna’s Archive because her online handle is “anarchivist”. She is, in fact, a woman.

          And I see no evidence to conclude that a man runs Anna’s Archive, but yours seems to be that women can’t do tech. You can fuck right off with that bullshit.