sunilkumardash9@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoClaude 4 Opus vs. Gemini 2.5 pro vs. OpenAI o3: Coding comparisoncomposio.devexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkClaude 4 Opus vs. Gemini 2.5 pro vs. OpenAI o3: Coding comparisoncomposio.devsunilkumardash9@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squaresunilkumardash9@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoTL;DR Claude Opus 4 leads in raw performance and prompt adherence. It understands user intentions better, reminiscent of 3.6 Sonnet. High taste. The generated outputs are tasteful. Retains the Opus 3 personality to an extent. Though unrelated to code, the model feels nice, and I never enjoyed talking to Gemini and o3. Gemini 2.5 is more affordable in pricing and takes fewer API credits than Opus. One million context length is undefeatable for large codebase understanding. Opus is the slowest in time to first token. You have to be patient with the thinking mode.
TL;DR