• MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This has happened with every generation when a new technology changes our environment, and our way of defending ourselves is to reject it or exaggerate its flaws.

    Because throughout history, many tools have existed, but over time they have fallen into disuse because too many people and/or there is a faster method that people use. But you can use that old tool.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This has also happened 100 times correctly to reject actually bad new technologies for every time it has been applied to the wrong technology that turned out to be actually useful.

      • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are you referring to projects that conceptualize something, but in the end it doesn’t come to fruition because it’s not possible due to lack of funding, lack of interest, it’s impossible, or there’s no technology required to complete it?