• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Either to take a very long time to get to the point, or to go off on a tangent.

        Writing concisely is a lost art, it seems.

        • idunnololz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I write concise until i started giving fiction writing a try. Suddenly writing concise was a negative :x (not always obviously but a lot of times I found that I wrote too concise).

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            IDK that kinda depends on the writer and their style. Concise is usually a safe bet for easy reading, but doesn’t leave room for a lot of fancy details. When I think verbose vs concise I think about Frank Herbert and Kurt Vonnegut for reference.

            • idunnololz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It’s not. I just wrote the comment because it was relevant to recent events for me.

              I started practicing writing non-fiction recently as a hobby. While writing non-fiction, I noticed that being concise 100% of the time is not good. Sometimes I did want to write concisely, other times I did not. When I was reading my writing back, I realized how deliberate you had to be about how much or how little detail you gave. It felt like a lot of rules of English went out the window. 100% grammatical correctness was not necessary if it meant better flow or pacing. Unnecessary details and repetition became tools instead of taboo. The whole experience felt like I was painting with words and as long as I can give the reader the experience I want nothing else mattered.

              It really highlighted the contrast between fiction and non-fiction writing. It was an eye-opening experience.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’d be careful with this one. Being verbose in non-fiction does not produce good writing automatically. In my opinion the best writers in the world have an economy of words but are still eloquent and rich in their expression

      • paequ2@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        To “waffle” comes from the 1956 movie Archie and the Waffle House. It’s a reference how the main character Archie famously ate a giant stack of waffles and became a town hero.

        — AI, probably

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hahaha let’s keep going with Archie and the Waffle House hallucinations

          To “grill” comes from the 1956 movie Archie and the Waffle House. It’s a reference to the chef cooking the waffles, which the main character Archie famously ate a giant stack of, and became the town hero.

    • Snazz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like that might have been the point. Rather than “using a car to go from A to B” they walked.