Most people still haven’t heard of Manifest V3, so if you are one of those not using Firefox, this is for you.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I like the artstyle, but the Mv3 blocking API has actually been improved to the point where uBO Lite, the Mv3 version of uBlock Origin, can block YouTube ads and only fails in edge cases.

    Also, Safari technically has the same extensions support as Firefox does, but developers have to pay to distribute their extensions. That doesn’t stop the existence of AdGuard.

    • siriusmart@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was under the impression the uBO lite wasn’t nearly as good and it missed a lot of ads, it seems like things have changed a bit since I’ve last followed on the MV3 situation.

      Also about Safari extension support, I didn’t research anything on this topic, I just thought it’s extension support must be incompetent because the uBlock Origin installation for Safari seemed like a hassle, turns out im not that far off.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        it seems like things have changed a bit since I’ve last followed on the MV3 situation.

        The keyword is “a bit”. It is now able to do the most basic things, but probably entirely useless in limiting tracking

    • siriusmart@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      just realised something, if my understanding is correct, MV3 also banned remotely hosted content, with a publish delay up to 2 weeks google (specifically youtube) can easily break uBO lite if they want to, i dont know if that is how uBO lite works, or if the rules will only be enforced after June, but if it is true uBO lite is not gonna live long either

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s not the only propose of uBO to block YouTube ads. It’s purpose is to block ads on as many sites as possible without breaking them, and also to block tracking in the same way. That needs a versatile and nouanced blocking list, with more of specific things to block instead of less of rather general things, and that sadly won’t fit in to that small limit.

      But there’s more. A lot of uBO’s capabilities depend on being able to act on the requests as happening. Content replacement, response spoofing, a lot of things. Look up uBO’s scriptlets and how are they used, is in the repo’s wiki. That won’t be possible with uBO Lite. It’s called Lite for a reason, and gorhill was (and is) furious for a reason.

      Remember, ad blocking is not just hiding them.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree that it is awful to remove the API for reasons you’ve mentioned, but my point was that it’s a misconception that Mv3 broke and limped all adblocking. Currently the list is big enough that only edge case trackers aren’t blocked.