An actual argument I recently saw:

Person B: “Any site which contains slurs against trans people in its sign up process is unreliable” (was referring to k!wifarms)

Person A: “Slurs aren’t considered bad in most countries”

Person B: “That doesn’t justify their usage. For example, conversion therapy isn’t considered bad or banned in most countries, that doesn’t mean conversion therapy is justified or good.”

Person A: “What are you talking about? Conversion therapy is banned in most countries”

Person B: “Shows a diagram showing that conversion therapy is only banned in a handful of countries”

Person A: “I mean in most civilized countries”

I’ve seen lots of other people refer to countries as civilized or uncivilized in similar contexts. Is this generally considered to be racist?

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    ‘Civilized’ is definitely not the right way to describe less privileged nations. People there certainly aren’t ‘uncivilized’, and to describe them as such carries heavy colonialist overtones.

    Though really you should’ve recognized the red flags from this person the moment they tried to justify the use of slurs.