If you’re in the majority, you have the votes to be able to accomplish something with reform. It’s not like we live in a monarchy, reform is possible under our system.
If reform isn’t working to bring about your goals, either your goals aren’t popular enough, or they are popular but the people lack the will and organization to vote for them.
If the people lack the will and organization to vote effectively, they certainly lack the will and organization to topple the government.
My area of expertise is managing complex systems and change implementation. I sincerely don’t understand how revolution is supposed to work where reform doesn’t. No one has been able to give me an answer that doesn’t bill down to idealistic hope. How is this revolution supposed to be implemented, and why can’t we build the foundation for revolution while simultaneously using the tools we have for reform? Wouldn’t widespread support for reform be the best possible proof of consensus?
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.
We could go several rounds on the nature of government and the human condition, but that would take time and effort. Instead, I’ll share a blind quote of dubious origin and hope you figure out the rest.
Meanwhile, some capitalist oligarch is paying a team of research psychologists to feed trillions of data points into a supercomputer to determine the exact font they need to use in their international astroturf advertising campaign designed to convince you that you already have the government you deserve.
