I mean, just declare a republic ffs.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s one way to see it… Countries that got rid of their monarchy, got the money in a more direct way

    • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      The British monarchy primarily “provides” money by owning land and other assets which would otherwise be government-owned. They also “earn” a shitload of money just for existing and still dump significant expenses onto taxpayers.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They provide about 1.5 billion pounds of tourism revenue per year, far outweighing the sovereign grants they recieve from the the government.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          You really think the tourists would stop looking at British castles etc. if the UK became a republic?

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I’m pretty sure the people calculating the number could distinguish between tourism for castles and the monarachy.

          • Knuschberkeks@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            some if them would. Some people are just fascinated by the anachronism of having a king. A palace that once belonged to some king a few hundred years back is just far less interesting than a palace with a living, breathing monarch in it.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              I highly disagree with that. It’s literally the opposite in opinion. I’m way more interested in castles where no one’s living in them now because that way they’re more of an historical Relic. Why do I want to see where some rich fuck head lives today? Let’s see some pricks big screen TV and fancy curtains. Ooh that sounds like fun. Fuck that I go to castles to see murder holes. I go to castles to see dungeons. Not duvets.

              The only time I want to see some rich fuck head living in a castle is when I see them dragged out of it to meet their just ends.