- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14217789
PiVPN is no longer maintained. You can find more information here
That’s a perfect ending: the need is no longer there, so it’s fulfilled its purpose and can close.
what is the alternative? I love how easy pivpn is
I just run a wireguard container on my raspberry pi 3b and use that to VPN onto my local network. Was super simple to set up
I’m going to attempt moving to wg-easy on Docker which is supposed to be, you know, easy…
pivpn takes care of adding and removing new clients for me. does wg easy make it convenient as well?
As far as I know there’s a web interface to sort out all that kind of stuff.
Yes. It provides you with a very simple web interface, basically only a list with connections and a button to add a new one.
Works very good. It can not do advanced stuff, but that is not the goal anyway.
+1 for wg-easy.
It is, indeed, very easy.
Yeah, that’s kind of what I was wondering. Turns out you can’t really do much useful with a self-hosted local VPN, but I like having the option of using one be something my VM host server provides.
Their watch has ended .