return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAudible unveils plans to use AI voices to narrate audiobookswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAudible unveils plans to use AI voices to narrate audiobookswww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoYep, copyright doesn’t apply to AI generated content. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/#%3A~%3Atext=U.S.+Circuit+Judge+Patricia+Millett+wrote+for%2Cthe+first+instance+by+a+human+being."
minus-squareJhex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agofree AI read audiobooks coming up
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoMe too: there’s just something about how repetitive thier cadence can be, and putting random infections and stresses on words where it doesn’t make sense.
minus-squareThreeme2189@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoHow about I spin up an AI model that outputs a near 1:1 copy of the training data? Does that circumvent the copyright?
Yep, copyright doesn’t apply to AI generated content.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/#%3A~%3Atext=U.S.+Circuit+Judge+Patricia+Millett+wrote+for%2Cthe+first+instance+by+a+human+being."
free AI read audiobooks coming up
deleted by creator
Me too: there’s just something about how repetitive thier cadence can be, and putting random infections and stresses on words where it doesn’t make sense.
How about I spin up an AI model that outputs a near 1:1 copy of the training data?
Does that circumvent the copyright?